Below are written summaries of the presentations that were recorded at the D4CE weekly meetings in October 2024.

No Nanobots in mRNA Vaccines — Just Lipids on the Loose

Dr. Anne Ulrich is a biochemistry professor at the Karlsruhe Institute of Technology. She explained persuasively in her presentation why there are no Nanobots in these vaccines. The commentary referred to the previous study by Lee and Broudy (2024), “Real-Time Self-Assembly of Stereomicroscopically Visible Artificial Constructs in Incubated Specimens of mRNA Products Mainly from Pfizer and Moderna: A Comprehensive Longitudinal Study.”

From Dr. Ulrich’s presentation, we have learned that

• Lipids are amphiphilic molecules and composed of a hydrophilic head and a hydrophobic tail. They are known to self-assemble, forming structures with various shapes and sizes.
• Lipids are the main components of the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines, in the form of lipid nanoparticles. The cationic lipids in the lipid nanoparticles are antimicrobial and, to a lesser degree, also cytotoxic to the human or other eukaryotic cells.
• The formation of different lipid structures is affected by many factors. In particular, the structures of lipid nanoparticles combined with RNA or DNA are metastable, meaning the shape and size of these particles will change over time.

Dr. Ulrich concluded her talk by presenting her personal risk assessment of the mRNA vaccines.

“Based on our scientific expertise and with full conviction, we would like to give reassurance that the abundant structures found in the mRNA vaccines are neither “nanobots” nor contaminants—but rather maturation and/or degradation products. This reasoning does not rule out the presence of minor impurities, as have been detected by highly sensitive analytical techniques, as also cited by Lee and Broudy. And it certainly does not give a thumbs-up for the new modRNA platform or a continuation of the vaccination campaign.”

Dr. Ulrich’s presentation is based on her recent commentary, which can be found at https://www.ijvtpr.com/index.php/IJVTPR/article/view/106

The Systematic Denial of Justice by the German Legal System in the COVID-19 Era

Wilfried Schmitz is a German lawyer. He shared his experiences of fighting against the manifold abuses of the law and the legal system over the last four years. His legal cases include a military complaint procedure before the Federal Administrative Court of Germany (Bundesverwaltungsgericht) and the defence of Dr. Heinrich Habig, a medical doctor who provided some of his patients with written exemptions from mask mandates Wilfried draws this stark conclusion:

“The administration of justice is completely corrupted and has lost its function.”

You can find out more about Wilfried Schmitz’s work and books in multiple languages at https://www.anwalt-schmitz.eu/.
Wilfried has published a civil lawsuit template, “Sample template for a civil action against BioNTech,” which vaccine victims could use to file against vaccine manufacturers. The template is available at https://www.anwalt-schmitz.eu/buecher/.

The science is settled? A critical look at the last assessment report of the IPCC.

“Climate changes and has always changed.”

The acronym “IPCC” stands for “Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.”  Dr. Ernst Hammel, a retired physicist, examined the IPCC’s assessment reports, which the agency uses to drive the political agenda for “saving the planet.” 

He concluded that the climate will be affected by both human activities and natural forces, but that

the IPCC Assessment Reports unduly focus on one factor only and are therefore biased.

Dr. Ernst Hammel’s new paper, “CO₂ Back-Radiation Sensitivity Studies under Laboratory and Field Conditions,”  experimentally addresses the so-called “climate sensitivity,” that is, how much warming to expect for a given increase in atmospheric CO₂.
The free full access is at https://www.scirp.org/journal/paperinformation?paperid=136478.